On 03/04/2017 08:01 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:=0A=

Some patch generates WARNINGS with checkpatch.pl, but these WARNINGS=0A=
seem to be either unavoidable for the involved pieces of code (which=0A=
the patch just extends), or false positives.=0A=

=0A=
The code in this series looks reasonably clean from a code style point=0A=
of view, but please address all checkpatch warnings that can be=0A=
addressed easily. A few examples of such checkpatch warnings:=0A=
=0A=
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"=0A=
=0A=
WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR' are not preferred.=0A=
Consider using octal permissions '0644'.=0A=
=0A=
Thanks,=0A=
=0A=
Bart.=0A=