Re: [PATCH 02/13] irq: Introduce IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED flag
From: Alexander Gordeev <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-22 11:58:06
Also in:
linux-nvme, linux-pci, lkml
From: Alexander Gordeev <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-22 11:58:06
Also in:
linux-nvme, linux-pci, lkml
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:19:51AM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:50:53PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:quoted
Does it matter on x86 systems whether or not these interrupt vectors are also associated with a CPU with a higher CPU number? Although multiple bits can be set in /proc/irq/<n>/smp_affinity only the first bit counts on x86 platforms. In default_cpu_mask_to_apicid_and() it is easy to see that only the first bit that has been set in that mask counts on x86 systems.Wow, thanks for the information. I didn't know the apic wasn't using the full cpu mask, so this changes how I need to look at this, and will experiment with such a configuration.
I have vague memories of this, but you probably need to check PPC as well. Its interrupt distribution is not straightforward as well, AFAIR. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme