Re: [PATCH 02/13] irq: Introduce IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED flag

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:36:54PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:

Sorry that I had not yet this made this clear but my concern is about a
system equipped with two or more adapters and with more CPU cores than the
number of MSI-X interrupts per adapter. Consider e.g. a system with two
adapters (A and B), 8 interrupts per adapter (A0..A7 and B0..B7), 32 CPU
cores and two NUMA nodes. Assuming that hyperthreading is disabled, will the
patches from this patch series generate the following interrupt assignment?

0: A0 B0
1: A1 B1
2: A2 B2
3: A3 B3
4: A4 B4
5: A5 B5
6: A6 B6
7: A7 B7
8: (none)
...
31: (none)

I'll need to look at the follow on patches do to confirm, but that's
not what this should do. All CPU's should have a vector assigned because
every CPU needs to be assigned a submission context using a vector. In
your example, every vector's affinity mask should be assigned to 4 CPUs:
vector '8' starts over with A0 B0, '9' gets A1 B1, and so on.

If it's done such that all CPUs are assigned and no sharing occurs across
NUMA nodes, does that change your concern?