Re: Git repositories
From: Kent Overstreet <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-27 22:01:49
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:00:31AM -0700, David Mohr wrote:
On 2015-01-26 16:37, Kent Overstreet wrote:quoted
Ok, I just merged from him and pushed.Great, thanks for getting that worked out so quickly! The merge doesn't import the tags though. I think it make sense to set those in the evilpiepierate's repository as well:
Ok, tags are pushed too now.
quoted
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Rolf Fokkens [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Well, to be honest I built the latest Fedora bcache-tools packages based on https://github.com/g2p/bcache-tools. So I'm perfectly happy with what's in it. If all of g2p's repo is merged into http://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcache-tools.git/ I'll use that one as my source repo again.Thanks for the quick feedback. FWIW, the debian packaging was also built upon g2p's repository. But now that there's the active bcache-dev branch on the evilpiepirate repository, and the website always refered to that repository as well, it was confusing. It seems better to coordinate in one central place. We will from now on use evilpiepirate's repository as upstream for the Debian packages.
I'm still probably going to be fairly absent for the next couple months unfortunately - if you guys are happy with what Gabriel is doing I'm fine with him continuing to maintain bcache tools. I can give him or someone access to push to my bcache-tools repository so you guys aren't blocked if I'm off somewhere ignoring email :)
quoted
quoted
So far I've been collaborating with Gabriel (g2p) using his Github repo as the starting point, assuming that's the one that will be pushed to evilpieprate in the end. At the moment though there are 3 pull requests pending (one of me) that don't get g2p's attention, I guess he's busy with other things. So I'll post my latest pull request here on the mailing list, so it can be discussed and Kent can decide if he wants to merge it.I'm assuming Gabriel is on the ML? I'd say he should have a chance to merge the remaining pull requests - if he doesn't, or says that he doesn't want to, then I will post them here on the ML manually for consideration. The Debian packages don't currently use any patches.
I would like to see the pull requests (and patches too, ideally) posted on the mailing list too - just with git send-email. Pull requests are fine, it's just nice see the patch on the list too.