Ok, I just merged from him and pushed.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Rolf Fokkens [off-list ref] wrote:

Well, to be honest I built the latest Fedora bcache-tools packages based on
https://github.com/g2p/bcache-tools. So I'm perfectly happy with what's in
it. If all of g2p's repo is merged into
http://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcache-tools.git/ I'll use that one as my
source repo again.

So far I've been collaborating with Gabriel (g2p) using his Github repo as
the starting point, assuming that's the one that will be pushed to
evilpieprate in the end. At the moment though there are 3 pull requests
pending (one of me) that don't get g2p's attention, I guess he's busy with
other things. So I'll post my latest pull request here on the mailing list,
so it can be discussed and Kent can decide if he wants to merge it.


On 01/26/2015 10:45 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:

quoted

Yeah - but do you suppose you could coordinate with the Fedora package
maintainer, Rolf Fokkens - and make sure pulling that stuff works for
him? Or if you guys have different patches, just let me know where I
can pull them from.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:24 PM, David Mohr [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi,

in discussions around the Debian packaging the question came up why
   http://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcache-tools.git/
is the official repository when it seems like the current stable
development
takes place in
   https://github.com/g2p/bcache-tools

Would it be possible to merge Gabriel's work back into the main
repository
so that we can refer to evilpiepirate.org as the definitive upstream? If
not, what's the relationship between the repositories?

Thanks,
~David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html