On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:03:57 +0000
Arne Wiebalck [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser [off-list ref]
 wrote:

quoted

On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:

quoted

On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:

quoted

(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3,
going all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's
anyone that cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually
use it), now would be a good time to pipe up.

Just "piping up" as I care about bcache and actually use it in
production on 3.10! Shame I don't have the knowledge to try and
backport these though :-)

Eddie

I'm "piping up" as well, I use bcache on 3.10 in production.

-Peter

More "piping up": we currently use bcache on a few nodes in
production, on 3.14 and 3.15, and plan to roll it out on a wider
scale now. If necessary we'll go with these kernels, but we'd
certainly prefer our usual 3.10-based CentOS kernel.

CentOS does not ship bcache at all. In retrospect it's obvious why.