Re: [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17
From: Arne Wiebalck <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-05 17:09:31
Also in:
lkml, stable
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:quoted
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:quoted
(from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually use it), now would be a good time to pipe up.Just "piping up" as I care about bcache and actually use it in production on 3.10! Shame I don't have the knowledge to try and backport these though :-) EddieI'm "piping up" as well, I use bcache on 3.10 in production. -Peter
More "piping up": we currently use bcache on a few nodes in production, on 3.14 and 3.15, and plan to roll it out on a wider scale now. If necessary we'll go with these kernels, but we'd certainly prefer our usual 3.10-based CentOS kernel. Cheers, Arne -- Arne Wiebalck CERN IT
Attachments
- smime.p7s [application/pkcs7-signature] 4311 bytes