On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 6:03 PM William Zhang
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Nitpicky. In your dt-bindings patch, you use <0xff800568> as example.
I guess it is better to use the same here to keep consistent, although
what value doe not really matter.
I did it this way on purpose because I didn't want to put 0x00000000 into the
example in the binding, lest the DT maintainers would complain
about that the dummy is not a good example.
All right. I don't have strong preference either way so it is up to
you or if anyone else has anything to say.
Me neither, I'll do it any way that makes Florian merge these patches :D
(I think Florian does the mach-bcm business?)
Yours,
Linus Walleij