On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 4:17 PM Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 7:02 PM William Zhang
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
+&CA7_0 {
+ enable-method = "brcm,bca-smp";
+ /* Dummy release address since CPU0 is already online */
+ cpu-release-addr = <0x00000000>;
quoted
Nitpicky. In your dt-bindings patch, you use <0xff800568> as example.
I guess it is better to use the same here to keep consistent, although
what value doe not really matter.
I did it this way on purpose because I didn't want to put 0x00000000 into the
example in the binding, lest the DT maintainers would complain
about that the dummy is not a good example.
All right. I don't have strong preference either way so it is up to
you or if anyone else has anything to say.
Yours,
Linus Walleij