Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2026-03-25

Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dma: arm-dma350: support combined IRQ mode with runtime IRQ topology detection

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: 2026-03-24 12:59:31
Also in: dmaengine, linux-devicetree, lkml

On 2026-03-23 11:48 am, Jun Guo wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
DMA-350 can be integrated with either per-channel IRQ lines or a single
combined IRQ line. Add support for both layouts in a unified way.

Detect IRQ topology at probe time via platform_irq_count(), then:
- request one global IRQ and enable DMANSECCTRL.INTREN_ANYCHINTR for
   combined mode, or
- request per-channel IRQs for channel mode.

Refactor IRQ completion/error handling into a shared channel handler
used by both global and per-channel IRQ paths, and guard against IRQs
arriving without an active descriptor.

Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3-Codex
Signed-off-by: Jun Guo <redacted>
---
  drivers/dma/arm-dma350.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 139 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/arm-dma350.c b/drivers/dma/arm-dma350.c
index 84220fa83029..2cf6f783b44f 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/arm-dma350.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/arm-dma350.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
  #include "virt-dma.h"
  
  #define DMAINFO			0x0f00
+#define DRIVER_NAME		"arm-dma350"
Why is this here in the middle of register definitions? But frankly why 
is it being added at all?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  #define DMA_BUILDCFG0		0xb0
  #define DMA_CFG_DATA_WIDTH	GENMASK(18, 16)
@@ -142,6 +143,9 @@
  #define LINK_LINKADDR		BIT(30)
  #define LINK_LINKADDRHI		BIT(31)
  
+/* DMA NONSECURE CONTROL REGISTER */
+#define DMANSECCTRL		0x20c
Please follow the existing code rather than making a confusing ugly 
mess. DMANSECCTRL is a register frame at offset 0x0200; it contains 
(among others) a register named NSEC_CTRL at offset 0x0c.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+#define INTREN_ANYCHINTR_EN	BIT(0)
  
  enum ch_ctrl_donetype {
  	CH_CTRL_DONETYPE_NONE = 0,
@@ -192,6 +196,7 @@ struct d350_chan {
  
  struct d350 {
  	struct dma_device dma;
+	void __iomem *base;
Why?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  	int nchan;
  	int nreq;
  	struct d350_chan channels[] __counted_by(nchan);
@@ -461,18 +466,40 @@ static void d350_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *chan)
  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dch->vc.lock, flags);
  }
  
-static irqreturn_t d350_irq(int irq, void *data)
+static void d350_handle_chan_irq(struct d350_chan *dch, struct device *dev,
+				 int chan_id, u32 ch_status)
  {
-	struct d350_chan *dch = data;
-	struct device *dev = dch->vc.chan.device->dev;
-	struct virt_dma_desc *vd = &dch->desc->vd;
-	u32 ch_status;
+	struct virt_dma_desc *vd;
+	bool intr_done = ch_status & CH_STAT_INTR_DONE;
+	bool intr_err = ch_status & CH_STAT_INTR_ERR;
  
-	ch_status = readl(dch->base + CH_STATUS);
-	if (!ch_status)
-		return IRQ_NONE;
+	if (!intr_done && !intr_err) {
Why is the logic being changed here?
+		if (chan_id >= 0)
+			dev_warn(dev, "Channel %d unexpected IRQ: 0x%08x\n",
+				 chan_id, ch_status);
Why? I see no reason why "dev" shouldn't still be the channel device.
+		else
+			dev_warn(dev, "Unexpected IRQ source? 0x%08x\n", ch_status);
+		writel_relaxed(ch_status, dch->base + CH_STATUS);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	writel_relaxed(ch_status, dch->base + CH_STATUS);
+
+	spin_lock(&dch->vc.lock);
+	if (!dch->desc) {
+		if (chan_id >= 0)
+			dev_warn(dev,
+				 "Channel %d IRQ without active descriptor: 0x%08x\n",
+				 chan_id, ch_status);
+		else
+			dev_warn(dev, "IRQ without active descriptor: 0x%08x\n",
+				 ch_status);
+		spin_unlock(&dch->vc.lock);
+		return;
+	}
This seems entirely new and nothing to do with refactoring. Why do you 
think it's necessary?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-	if (ch_status & CH_STAT_INTR_ERR) {
+	vd = &dch->desc->vd;
+	if (intr_err) {
  		u32 errinfo = readl_relaxed(dch->base + CH_ERRINFO);
  
  		if (errinfo & (CH_ERRINFO_AXIRDPOISERR | CH_ERRINFO_AXIRDRESPERR))
@@ -483,14 +510,10 @@ static irqreturn_t d350_irq(int irq, void *data)
  			vd->tx_result.result = DMA_TRANS_ABORTED;
  
  		vd->tx_result.residue = d350_get_residue(dch);
-	} else if (!(ch_status & CH_STAT_INTR_DONE)) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "Unexpected IRQ source? 0x%08x\n", ch_status);
  	}
-	writel_relaxed(ch_status, dch->base + CH_STATUS);
  
-	spin_lock(&dch->vc.lock);
I can't recall the details off-hand right now, but I have a strong 
feeling the order of operations here was reasonably significant - what's 
the justifcation for changing it?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  	vchan_cookie_complete(vd);
-	if (ch_status & CH_STAT_INTR_DONE) {
+	if (intr_done) {
  		dch->status = DMA_COMPLETE;
  		dch->residue = 0;
  		d350_start_next(dch);
@@ -499,6 +522,44 @@ static irqreturn_t d350_irq(int irq, void *data)
  		dch->residue = vd->tx_result.residue;
  	}
  	spin_unlock(&dch->vc.lock);
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t d350_global_irq(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct d350 *dmac = (struct d350 *)data;
This isn't C++
+	irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
+	int i;
+
+	(void)irq;
Why?
+	for (i = 0; i < dmac->nchan; i++) {
+		struct d350_chan *dch = &dmac->channels[i];
+		u32 ch_status;
+
+		ch_status = readl(dch->base + CH_STATUS);
+		if (!ch_status)
Why is this factored out, only to be duplicated in both callers?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+			continue;
+
+		ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
+		d350_handle_chan_irq(dch, dmac->dma.dev, i, ch_status);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t d350_channel_irq(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct d350_chan *dch = data;
+	struct device *dev = dch->vc.chan.device->dev;
+	u32 ch_status;
+
+	(void)irq;
+
+	ch_status = readl(dch->base + CH_STATUS);
+	if (!ch_status)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+
+	d350_handle_chan_irq(dch, dev, -1, ch_status);
  
  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
  }
@@ -506,10 +567,18 @@ static irqreturn_t d350_irq(int irq, void *data)
  static int d350_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
  {
  	struct d350_chan *dch = to_d350_chan(chan);
-	int ret = request_irq(dch->irq, d350_irq, IRQF_SHARED,
-			      dev_name(&dch->vc.chan.dev->device), dch);
-	if (!ret)
-		writel_relaxed(CH_INTREN_DONE | CH_INTREN_ERR, dch->base + CH_INTREN);
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (dch->irq >= 0) {
+		ret = request_irq(dch->irq, d350_channel_irq, IRQF_SHARED,
+				  dev_name(&dch->vc.chan.dev->device), dch);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(chan->device->dev, "Failed to request IRQ %d\n", dch->irq);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	writel_relaxed(CH_INTREN_DONE | CH_INTREN_ERR, dch->base + CH_INTREN);
  
  	return ret;
  }
@@ -519,18 +588,21 @@ static void d350_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
  	struct d350_chan *dch = to_d350_chan(chan);
  
  	writel_relaxed(0, dch->base + CH_INTREN);
-	free_irq(dch->irq, dch);
+	if (dch->irq >= 0) {
+		free_irq(dch->irq, dch);
+		dch->irq = -EINVAL;
+	}
  	vchan_free_chan_resources(&dch->vc);
  }
  
  static int d350_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct d350 *dmac;
+	struct d350 *dmac = NULL;
Why?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  	void __iomem *base;
  	u32 reg;
-	int ret, nchan, dw, aw, r, p;
-	bool coherent, memset;
+	int ret, nchan, dw, aw, r, p, irq_count;
+	bool coherent, memset, combined_irq;
  
  	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
  	if (IS_ERR(base))
@@ -556,6 +628,7 @@ static int d350_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  		return -ENOMEM;
  
  	dmac->nchan = nchan;
+	dmac->base = base;
  
  	reg = readl_relaxed(base + DMAINFO + DMA_BUILDCFG1);
  	dmac->nreq = FIELD_GET(DMA_CFG_NUM_TRIGGER_IN, reg);
@@ -582,12 +655,46 @@ static int d350_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	dmac->dma.device_issue_pending = d350_issue_pending;
  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dmac->dma.channels);
  
+	irq_count = platform_irq_count(pdev);
+	if (irq_count < 0)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, irq_count,
+				     "Failed to count interrupts\n");
+
+	if (irq_count == 1) {
+		combined_irq = true;
What if there's only 1 channel and it is actually using its dedicated IRQ?
+	} else if (irq_count >= nchan) {
+		combined_irq = false;
+	} else {
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
+				     "Invalid IRQ count %d for %d channels\n",
+				     irq_count, nchan);
Thsi is a change in behaviour, since we wouldm't currently consider it 
an error if the last 1 or more channels don't have an interrupt, but 
aren't accessible anyway - if a system *always* reserved the last couple 
of channels for the Secure world, arguably there would be no real 
requiremnt to describe them in the Non-Secure DT at all.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	}
+
+	if (combined_irq) {
+		int host_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+
+		if (host_irq < 0)
+			return dev_err_probe(dev, host_irq,
+					     "Failed to get IRQ\n");
+
+		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, host_irq, d350_global_irq,
+				       IRQF_SHARED, DRIVER_NAME, dmac);
+		if (ret)
+			return dev_err_probe(
+				dev, ret,
+				"Failed to request the combined IRQ %d\n",
+				host_irq);
+		/* Combined Non-Secure Channel Interrupt Enable */
+		writel_relaxed(INTREN_ANYCHINTR_EN, dmac->base + DMANSECCTRL);
+	}
+
  	/* Would be nice to have per-channel caps for this... */
  	memset = true;
  	for (int i = 0; i < nchan; i++) {
  		struct d350_chan *dch = &dmac->channels[i];
  
  		dch->base = base + DMACH(i);
+		dch->irq = -EINVAL;
  		writel_relaxed(CH_CMD_CLEAR, dch->base + CH_CMD);
  
  		reg = readl_relaxed(dch->base + CH_BUILDCFG1);
@@ -595,10 +702,15 @@ static int d350_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  			dev_warn(dev, "No command link support on channel %d\n", i);
  			continue;
  		}
-		dch->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
-		if (dch->irq < 0)
-			return dev_err_probe(dev, dch->irq,
-					     "Failed to get IRQ for channel %d\n", i);
+
+		if (!combined_irq) {
+			dch->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
But here's the thing - even if we *were* to do something special in the 
DT binding, why not simply have:

	if (combined_irq)
		dch->irq = combined_irq_num;
	else
		dch->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);

at this point, and then let everything else keep working the way it 
already does?

Thanks,
Robin.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+			if (dch->irq < 0)
+				return dev_err_probe(
+					dev, dch->irq,
+					"Failed to get IRQ for channel %d\n",
+					i);
+		}
  
  		dch->has_wrap = FIELD_GET(CH_CFG_HAS_WRAP, reg);
  		dch->has_trig = FIELD_GET(CH_CFG_HAS_TRIGIN, reg) &
@@ -640,6 +752,7 @@ static void d350_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
  }
  
  static const struct of_device_id d350_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
+	{ .compatible = "cix,sky1-dma-350" },
  	{ .compatible = "arm,dma-350" },
  	{}
  };
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help