Hi Frank,

On 18.02.26 17:59, Frank Li wrote:

On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 02:25:06PM +0100, Frieder Schrempf wrote:

quoted

From: Frieder Schrempf <redacted>

The SMARC eval carrier has a power switch for the SD card compliant
to the OSM standard definition. To use this as already specified in
the OSM base devicetree, stop overriding it in the board tree.

This fixes the power-supply for the SC card.

Is below commit better?

Do you mean "commit message"?

Did you run my message through a LLM to enhance it and now feed it back
to me?

If yes, it is a very strange way to waste GPU cycles and developer time.

ARM: dts: imx8mp-sm2s-imx8mp: Drop SD power-supply override

The subject line is completely wrong.

The SMARC evaluation carrier provides an SD card power switch that complies
with the OSM standard definition. The OSM base device tree already
describes this correctly.

Stop overriding the SD power-supply in the board device tree and rely on
the definition from the OSM base DTS instead to fix the power-supply
configuration for the SD card.

Ok, maybe this rephrasing is slightly better to read, but again: is this
really worth the efforts? And it doesn't even correct my mistake of
using either 'vmmc-supply' to refer to the property or "power supply"
without a dash.

Thanks
Frieder

quoted

Fixes: 6fe1ced5ccab7 ("arm64: dts: Add support for Kontron i.MX8MP SMARC module and eval carrier")
Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <redacted>
---
 .../boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-kontron-smarc-eval-carrier.dts     | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-kontron-smarc-eval-carrier.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-kontron-smarc-eval-carrier.dts
index 2173a36ff6917..74d620dd06b7b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-kontron-smarc-eval-carrier.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-kontron-smarc-eval-carrier.dts

@@ -249,6 +249,5 @@ &usb3_phy1 {
 };

 &usdhc2 {
-	vmmc-supply = <&reg_vdd_3v3>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
--

2.52.0