Re: [PATCH] perf vendor events arm64: Add Tegra410 Olympus PMU events
From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Date: 2026-01-28 09:36:35
Also in:
linux-perf-users, linux-tegra, lkml
On 28/01/2026 8:03 am, Ian Rogers wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 3:00 PM Besar Wicaksono [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Add JSON files for NVIDIA Tegra410 Olympus core PMU events. Also updated the common-and-microarch.json. Signed-off-by: Besar Wicaksono <redacted> --- .../arch/arm64/common-and-microarch.json | 90 +++ tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/mapfile.csv | 1 + .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/branch.json | 45 ++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/brbe.json | 6 + .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/bus.json | 48 ++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/exception.json | 62 ++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/fp_operation.json | 78 ++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/general.json | 15 + .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/l1d_cache.json | 122 +++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/l1i_cache.json | 114 +++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/l2d_cache.json | 134 ++++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/ll_cache.json | 107 +++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/memory.json | 46 ++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/metrics.json | 722 ++++++++++++++++++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/misc.json | 646 ++++++++++++++++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/retired.json | 94 +++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/spe.json | 42 + .../arm64/nvidia/t410/spec_operation.json | 230 ++++++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/stall.json | 145 ++++ .../arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/tlb.json | 158 ++++ 20 files changed, 2905 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/branch.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/brbe.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/bus.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/exception.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/fp_operation.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/general.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/l1d_cache.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/l1i_cache.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/l2d_cache.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/ll_cache.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/memory.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/metrics.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/misc.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/retired.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/spe.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/spec_operation.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/stall.json create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/tlb.jsondiff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/common-and-microarch.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/common-and-microarch.json index 468cb085d879..6af15776ff17 100644 --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/common-and-microarch.json +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/common-and-microarch.json@@ -179,6 +179,11 @@ "EventName": "BUS_CYCLES", "BriefDescription": "Bus cycle" }, + { + "EventCode": "0x001E", + "EventName": "CHAIN", + "BriefDescription": "Chain a pair of event counters." + },Cool stuff :-) For wider counters AMD does something similar, but should this be an implementation detail rather than an exposed event? How does it operate as an event?
CHAIN should be excluded from the json, it's used internally by the driver when you want 64 bit counters. Userspace can't use it because it can't control where counters are placed to make sure they're adjacent.
[snip]quoted
diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/mapfile.csv b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/mapfile.csv index bb3fa8a33496..7f0eaa702048 100644 --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/mapfile.csv +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/mapfile.csv@@ -46,3 +46,4 @@ 0x00000000500f0000,v1,ampere/emag,core 0x00000000c00fac30,v1,ampere/ampereone,core 0x00000000c00fac40,v1,ampere/ampereonex,core +0x000000004e0f0100,v1,nvidia/t410,corediff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/branch.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/branch.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..532bc59dc573 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/branch.json@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +[ + { + "ArchStdEvent": "BR_MIS_PRED", + "PublicDescription": "The Event counts Branches which are speculatively executed and mis-predicted."nit: The capitalization on Event and Branches, as well as other words, is a little unusual.
If there's nothing specific to this CPU then the public description
could be left out entierly. The common strings already say the same
thing as this:
{
"PublicDescription": "Mispredicted or not predicted branch
speculatively executed",
"EventCode": "0x10",
"EventName": "BR_MIS_PRED",
"BriefDescription": "Mispredicted or not predicted branch
speculatively executed"
},
[snip]quoted
diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/metrics.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/metrics.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..18c2fd58ee9e --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/nvidia/t410/metrics.json@@ -0,0 +1,722 @@ +[ + { + "MetricName": "backend_bound", + "MetricExpr": "100 * (STALL_SLOT_BACKEND / CPU_SLOT)", + "BriefDescription": "This metric is the percentage of total slots that were stalled due to resource constraints in the backend of the processor.", + "ScaleUnit": "1percent of slots", + "MetricGroup": "TopdownL1"Note, on x86 we place TopdownL1 in the Default metric group so it is shown by `perf stat` when it isn't given events or metrics to compute. Perhaps you want to do something similar? https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/icelake/icl-metrics.json?h=tmp.perf-tools-next#n116 Thanks, Ian
That's currently true for the Arm topdown metrics in sbsa.json, but we probably don't actually want this because there aren't enough counters for the perf stat defaults plus topdown and it results in multiplexing and bad results. I was planning to change it but we also don't currently expose the number of counters available either...