Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2026-01-23
STALE157d REVIEWED: 5 (5M)
Revisions (6)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v4 [diff vs current]
  4. v5 [diff vs current]
  5. v6 [diff vs current]
  6. v7 current

[PATCH rc v7 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Mark STE MEV safe when computing the update sequence

From: Nicolin Chen <hidden>
Date: 2026-01-15 18:24:00
Also in: linux-iommu, lkml
Subsystem: arm smmu drivers, iommu subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Will Deacon, Joerg Roedel, Linus Torvalds

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Nested CD tables set the MEV bit to try to reduce multi-fault spamming on
the hypervisor. Since MEV is in STE word 1 this causes a breaking update
sequence that is not required and impacts real workloads.

For the purposes of STE updates the value of MEV doesn't matter, if it is
set/cleared early or late it just results in a change to the fault reports
that must be supported by the kernel anyhow. The spec says:

 Note: Software must expect, and be able to deal with, coalesced fault
 records even when MEV == 0.

So mark STE MEV safe when computing the update sequence, to avoid creating
a breaking update.

Fixes: da0c56520e88 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Set MEV bit in nested STE for DoS mitigations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <redacted>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 390446d259ab..ccd6357fa5a8 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -1086,6 +1086,16 @@ VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
 void arm_smmu_get_ste_update_safe(const __le64 *cur, const __le64 *target,
 				  __le64 *safe_bits)
 {
+	/*
+	 * MEV does not meaningfully impact the operation of the HW, it only
+	 * changes how many fault events are generated, thus we can relax it
+	 * when computing the ordering. The spec notes the device can act like
+	 * MEV=1 anyhow:
+	 *
+	 *  Note: Software must expect, and be able to deal with, coalesced
+	 *  fault records even when MEV == 0.
+	 */
+	safe_bits[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arm_smmu_get_ste_update_safe);
 
-- 
2.43.0

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help