Re: [PATCH v2 18/45] arm_mpam: resctrl: Implement resctrl_arch_reset_all_ctrls()
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Date: 2026-01-06 11:19:39
Also in:
kvmarm, lkml
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Date: 2026-01-06 11:19:39
Also in:
kvmarm, lkml
Hi Jonathan, On 1/5/26 17:51, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 18:11:20 +0000 Ben Horgan [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> We already have a helper for resetting an mpam class and component. Hook it up to resctrl_arch_reset_all_ctrls() and the domain offline path. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>I left all the context as my one comment on this is I don't see a reason to expose mpam_reset_class() Only the _locked() variant ever seems to be used outside of mpam_devices.cquoted
---
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h index 554e4887ba81..b9a739abb101 100644 --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h@@ -389,6 +389,13 @@ extern u8 mpam_pmg_max; void mpam_enable(struct work_struct *work); void mpam_disable(struct work_struct *work); +/* Reset all the RIS in a class, optionally while holding cpus_read_lock() */ +void mpam_reset_class_locked(struct mpam_class *class); +void mpam_reset_class(struct mpam_class *class);Not clear from this patch why we need to expose mpam_reset_class()
Good spot. That's not required in this series, so I will stop exposing it. Thanks, Ben