Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: cix: add OrangePi 6 Plus board
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-01-05 08:21:11
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 03:53:59PM +0800, Gary Yang wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
OrangePi 6 Plus adopts CIX CD8180/CD8160 SoC, built-in 12-core 64-bit processor + NPU processor,integrated graphics processor, equipped with 16GB/32GB/64GB LPDDR5, and provides two M.2 KEY-M interfaces 2280 for NVMe SSD,as well as SPI FLASH and TF slots to meet the needs of fast read/write and high-capacity storage Signed-off-by: Gary Yang <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml index 114dab4bc4d2..9e132e609b7b 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml@@ -16,9 +16,16 @@ properties: compatible: oneOf: - - description: Radxa Orion O6 + - description: Radxa Orion O6 board items: - - const: radxa,orion-o6 + - enum: + - radxa,orion-o6 + - const: cix,sky1 + + - description: Xunlong orangepi 6 plus board + items: + - enum: + - xunlong,orangepi-6-plus
Previous patch was correct, not this one. <form letter> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they apply. Please read: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. </form letter> Read last sentence and linked documentation. Where did you explain ignoring/dropping my tag? Best regards, Krzysztof