Re: [PATCH rc v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested s1bypass/s1dssbypass coverage
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2025-12-10 01:54:06
Also in:
linux-iommu, lkml
在 2025/12/10 05:04, Nicolin Chen 写道:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 11:43:41AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:quoted
Hi, Nicolin, Nit. Instead of duplicating this code, we can leverage the existing arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste() helper here.Thanks for the review. I squashed the following changes:diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c index 1672e75ebffc2..197b8b55fe7a2 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c@@ -33,8 +33,12 @@ static struct mm_struct sva_mm = { enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat { ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS = BIT(0), ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_STALL = BIT(1), + ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED = BIT(2), }; +static void arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *ste, + enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat feat); + static bool arm_smmu_entry_differs_in_used_bits(const __le64 *entry, const __le64 *used_bits, const __le64 *target,@@ -198,6 +202,17 @@ static void arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *ste, }; arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(ste, &master, ats_enabled, s1dss); + if (feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED) { + struct arm_smmu_ste s2ste; + int i; + + arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2ste, ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS); + ste->data[0] |= cpu_to_le64( + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_NESTED)); + ste->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV); + for (i = 2; i < NUM_ENTRY_QWORDS; i++) + ste->data[i] = s2ste.data[i]; + } } static void arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_bypass_to_abort(struct kunit *test)@@ -555,46 +570,17 @@ static void arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s2_to_s1_stall(struct kunit *test) NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(3)); } -static void arm_smmu_test_make_nested_cdtable_ste( - struct arm_smmu_ste *ste, unsigned int s1dss, const dma_addr_t dma_addr, - enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat feat) -{ - bool stall_enabled = feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_STALL; - bool ats_enabled = feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS; - struct arm_smmu_ste s1ste; - - struct arm_smmu_master master = { - .ats_enabled = ats_enabled, - .cd_table.cdtab_dma = dma_addr, - .cd_table.s1cdmax = 0xFF, - .cd_table.s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2, - .smmu = &smmu, - .stall_enabled = stall_enabled, - }; - - arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(ste, ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS); - arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(&s1ste, &master, ats_enabled, s1dss); - - ste->data[0] = cpu_to_le64( - STRTAB_STE_0_V | - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_NESTED)); - ste->data[0] |= s1ste.data[0] & ~cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG); - ste->data[1] |= s1ste.data[1]; - /* Merge events for DoS mitigations on eventq */ - ste->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV); -} - static void arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_nested_s1dssbypass_to_s1bypass(struct kunit *test) { struct arm_smmu_ste s1_ste; struct arm_smmu_ste s2_ste; - arm_smmu_test_make_nested_cdtable_ste(&s1_ste, - STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS, - fake_cdtab_dma_addr, - ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS); + arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste( + &s1_ste, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS, fake_cdtab_dma_addr, + ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS | ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED); arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2_ste, 0); + /* Expect an additional sync to unset ignored bits: EATS and MEV */ arm_smmu_v3_test_ste_expect_hitless_transition(test, &s1_ste, &s2_ste, NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(3)); }@@ -605,10 +591,9 @@ arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_nested_s1bypass_to_s1dssbypass(struct kunit *test) struct arm_smmu_ste s1_ste; struct arm_smmu_ste s2_ste; - arm_smmu_test_make_nested_cdtable_ste(&s1_ste, - STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS, - fake_cdtab_dma_addr, - ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS); + arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste( + &s1_ste, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS, fake_cdtab_dma_addr, + ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS | ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED); arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2_ste, 0); arm_smmu_v3_test_ste_expect_hitless_transition(test, &s2_ste, &s1_ste, NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(2));
Nice work. LGTM. Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> Thanks. Shuai