Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2025-10-03

Re: [PATCH v12 2/9] dma-buf: dma-heap: export declared functions

From: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Date: 2025-10-02 19:45:55
Also in: dri-devel, linux-media, lkml, op-tee

On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 12:47 AM Maxime Ripard [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 03:49:43PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
quoted
Export the dma-buf heap functions to allow them to be used by the OP-TEE
driver. The OP-TEE driver wants to register and manage specific secure
DMA heaps with it.

Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <redacted>
Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <redacted>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
index 3cbe87d4a464..8ab49924f8b7 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <linux/dma-buf.h>
 #include <linux/dma-heap.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/nospec.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
@@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ void *dma_heap_get_drvdata(struct dma_heap *heap)
 {
      return heap->priv;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_heap_get_drvdata, "DMA_BUF_HEAP");

 /**
  * dma_heap_get_name - get heap name
@@ -214,6 +216,7 @@ const char *dma_heap_get_name(struct dma_heap *heap)
 {
      return heap->name;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_heap_get_name, "DMA_BUF_HEAP");

 /**
  * dma_heap_add - adds a heap to dmabuf heaps
@@ -303,6 +306,7 @@ struct dma_heap *dma_heap_add(const struct dma_heap_export_info *exp_info)
      kfree(heap);
      return err_ret;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_heap_add, "DMA_BUF_HEAP");
It's not clear to me why we would need to export those symbols.

As far as I know, heaps cannot be removed, and compiling them as module
means that we would be able to remove them.

Now, if we don't expect the users to be compiled as modules, then we
don't need to export these symbols at all.

Am I missing something?
For things like distro kernels (or in Android's case, the GKI),
there's a benefit for modules that can be loaded permanently (not
having a module_exit hook).
One doesn't have to bloat the base kernel image/memory usage for
everyone, while still not having to necessarily deal with
complications from module unloading issues.

thanks
-john
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help