Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: allwinner: h313: Add Amediatech X96Q
From: J. Neuschäfer <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-15 13:40:18
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-sunxi, lkml
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:54:49AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 01:52:10 +0200 J. Neuschäfer via B4 Relay [off-list ref] wrote: Hi, many thanks for posting the DT, I really wish more people would do that!quoted
From: "J. Neuschäfer" <redacted> The X96Q is a set-top box with an H313 SoC, AXP305 PMIC, 1 or 2 GiB RAM, 8 or 16 GiB eMMC flash, 2x USB A, Micro-SD, HDMI, Ethernet, audio/video output, and infrared input. https://x96mini.com/products/x96q-tv-box-android-10-set-top-box Tested, works: - debug UART - status LED - USB ports in host mode - MicroSD - eMMC - recovery button hidden behind audio/video port - analog audio (line out) Does not work: - Ethernet (requires AC200 MFD/EPHY driver) - analog video output (requires AC200 driver) - HDMI audio/video output Untested: - "OTG" USB port in device mode - built-in IR receiver - external IR receiver - WLAN (requires out-of-tree XRadio driver) Table of regulators on the downstream kernel, for reference: vcc-5v 1 15 0 unknown 5000mV 0mA 5000mV 5000mV dcdca 0 0 0 unknown 900mV 0mA 0mV 0mV dcdcb 0 0 0 unknown 1350mV 0mA 0mV 0mV dcdcc 0 0 0 unknown 900mV 0mA 0mV 0mV dcdcd 0 0 0 unknown 1500mV 0mA 0mV 0mV dcdce 0 0 0 unknown 3300mV 0mA 0mV 0mV aldo1 0 0 0 unknown 3300mV 0mA 0mV 0mV aldo2 0 0 0 unknown 700mV 0mA 0mV 0mV aldo3 0 0 0 unknown 700mV 0mA 0mV 0mV bldo1 0 0 0 unknown 1800mV 0mA 0mV 0mV bldo2 0 0 0 unknown 1800mV 0mA 0mV 0mV bldo3 0 0 0 unknown 700mV 0mA 0mV 0mV bldo4 0 0 0 unknown 700mV 0mA 0mV 0mV cldo1 0 0 0 unknown 2500mV 0mA 0mV 0mV cldo2 0 0 0 unknown 700mV 0mA 0mV 0mV cldo3 0 0 0 unknown 700mV 0mA 0mV 0mV Signed-off-by: J. Neuschäfer <redacted> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h313-x96q.dts | 235 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 236 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile index 780aeba0f3a4e14d69c9602e37b8d299165507b9..2edfa7bf4ab31c4aa934da98e5e042edc9aaf600 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-pine-h64-model-b.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6-mini.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h313-tanix-tx1.dtb +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h313-x96q.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h616-bigtreetech-cb1-manta.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h616-bigtreetech-pi.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h616-orangepi-zero2.dtbdiff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h313-x96q.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h313-x96q.dts new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9534eb03b89557f2545af5af7cf43390be722cf0 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h313-x96q.dts@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT) +/* + * Copyright (C) 2025 J. Neuschäfer <j.ne@posteo.net> + */ + +/dts-v1/; + +#include "sun50i-h616.dtsi" +#include "sun50i-h616-cpu-opp.dtsi" + +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> +#include <dt-bindings/input/linux-event-codes.h> +#include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h> + +/ { + model = "X96Q"; + compatible = "amediatech,x96q", "allwinner,sun50i-h616"; + + aliases { + mmc0 = &mmc0; + mmc1 = &mmc1; + mmc2 = &mmc2;We don't do mmc aliases in the upstream DTs. Long story, but you should not need them. I guess you want to disagree ;-),
I've seen mmc aliases before, and I've seen the annoying effects of an unstable probe order, so this is mostly of thing of habit.
in this case U-Boot has you covered, by adding the aliases during build time: just use $fdtcontroladdr, as you should do anyway.
I'm using a recent upstream U-Boot with a FIT image ('make image.fit' in
the Linux source tree). In this case U-Boot does not add mmc aliases.
Is there a special Kconfig option I need to enable in U-Boot?
What do you mean by 'build time'? U-Boot's?
quoted
+ serial0 = &uart0; + };
[...]
quoted
+&mmc0 { + vmmc-supply = <®_aldo1>; + cd-gpios = <&pio 5 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PF6 */ + disable-wp; + bus-width = <4>; + max-frequency = <150000000>;That line is already in the .dtsi file, so redundant.
Good point, removing.
quoted
+ status = "okay"; + /* µSD */If we really need this comment, it should be above, right after the "&mmc0 {". And I wonder if it should be "microSD" instead.
Good points, I'll do both.
quoted
+}; + +&mmc1 { + /* TODO: XRadio XR819 WLAN */Either you just keep the comment, an mention mmc1, but don't reference the node, or you add the properties that you know of already, like vmmc-supply, vqmmc-supply, mmc-pwrseq, bus-width, non-removable. But this "empty reference with a comment" is somewhat odd.
I'll change it to a pure comment for now.
quoted
+}; + +&mmc2 { + vmmc-supply = <®_aldo1>; + vqmmc-supply = <®_bldo1>; + non-removable; + cap-mmc-hw-reset; + mmc-ddr-1_8v; + mmc-hs200-1_8v; + bus-width = <8>; + max-frequency = <100000000>;Are you sure you need that?
I found it in the downstream DT. The eMMC probes fine without it, so I'll remove it. The eMMC datasheet (assuming I found the right one), claims a maximum of 200 MHz, so the 100 MHz restriction seems unnecessary.
quoted
+ status = "okay"; + /* eMMC */Please move that comment up.
Will do. [...]
quoted
+ regulators { + reg_dcdca: dcdca { + regulator-always-on; + regulator-min-microvolt = <810000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>; + regulator-name = "vdd-cpu"; + }; + + dcdcb { + /* unused */ + }; + + reg_dcdcc: dcdcc { + regulator-always-on; + regulator-min-microvolt = <810000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <990000>; + regulator-name = "vdd-gpu-sys"; + }; + + dcdcd { + regulator-always-on;Why is this always on? What happens if you remove that line or turn it off? For always-on regulators we either need a comment saying why, or, better, have an explanatory regulator-name (like above). Is that for DRAM, by any chance (1.5V for DDR3 chips)?
The observed behavior is that the system halts when dcdcd is disabled. The relationship is a bit hard to determine without schematics, but the DDR3 chips (Micron MT41J256M4) do indeed use 1.5V. Since this is the only source of 1.5V, I think it's a safe guess that this is indeed the DRAM regulator.
Cheers, Andre
Thanks for the review! J. Neuschäfer