On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:47:01 +0100,
Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Sep 10 2025 at 09:28, Marc Zyngier wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 08 Sep 2025 17:31:17 +0100,
As Will points out off the list, the above lacks the a similar
handling for percpu_devid NMIs, leading to NMIs that are only handled
on the first affinity group.

It's easy enough to move the above to common code and share it with
handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi(), but at this point there is hardly
any difference with handle_percpu_devid_irq().

Any objection to simply killing the NMI version?

Removing code is always appreciated :)

Works for me!

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.