Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mfd: mt6397: Add new bit definitions for RTC_BBPU register
From: Shunxi Zhang (章顺喜) <hidden>
Date: 2025-08-19 07:53:43
Also in:
linux-mediatek, linux-rtc, lkml
On Mon, 2025-08-11 at 15:21 +0400, Giorgi Tchankvetadze wrote:
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
you have verified the sender or the content.
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Shunxi,
Can you confirm whether `RTC_BBPU_PWREN` (bit 0),
`RTC_BBPU_CLR` (bit 1) and `RTC_BBPU_RESET_AL` (bit 3) are documented
in the MT6397 datasheet (please cite section/page)? They look like
standard RTC controls (power enable, clear/reset, alarm reset) and
might be useful to include, but I agree with Krzysztof that adding
definitions with no users can accumulate technical debt.
Suggestion: either
- add the definitions when a driver actually needs them, or
- keep them now but add a short rationale in the commit message
(datasheet reference + intended use) so future reviewers understand
why they exist.
Also: please split cosmetic whitespace fixes (RTC_BBPU_KEY) into a
separate patch to make review/merge easier.
Thanks for the patch; I’m following the thread.
— GiorgiDear sir, The MT6397 is an integration of several ICs and does not have a separate IC specification. I will check the relevant IC datasheets again. I will remove the useless define in next version. Thanks for your commnets. Best regards Shunxi Zhangus
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 3:03 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 11/08/2025 10:15, ot_shunxi.zhang@mediatek.com wrote:quoted
From: Shunxi Zhang <redacted> This patch adds new bit definitions for the RTC_BBPU register in theWhy? There is no user of these. Don't add useless defines.quoted
mt6397 RTC header file. The following bit definitions are introduced:Hm?quoted
Signed-off-by: Shunxi Zhang <redacted> --- include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.hb/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h index 27883af44f87..001cef6b7302 100644--- a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h +++ b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h@@ -15,8 +15,11 @@ #include <linux/rtc.h> #define RTC_BBPU 0x0000 +#define RTC_BBPU_PWREN BIT(0) +#define RTC_BBPU_CLR BIT(1) +#define RTC_BBPU_RESET_AL BIT(3) #define RTC_BBPU_CBUSY BIT(6) -#define RTC_BBPU_KEY (0x43 << 8) +#define RTC_BBPU_KEY (0x43 << 8)Why? Best regards, Krzysztof