Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2025-08-19

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mfd: mt6397: Add new bit definitions for RTC_BBPU register

From: Shunxi Zhang (章顺喜) <hidden>
Date: 2025-08-19 07:53:43
Also in: linux-mediatek, linux-rtc, lkml

On Mon, 2025-08-11 at 15:21 +0400, Giorgi Tchankvetadze wrote:
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
you have verified the sender or the content.


Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
    linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
    linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
    linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Shunxi,

Can you confirm whether `RTC_BBPU_PWREN` (bit 0),
`RTC_BBPU_CLR` (bit 1) and `RTC_BBPU_RESET_AL` (bit 3) are documented
in the MT6397 datasheet (please cite section/page)? They look like
standard RTC controls (power enable, clear/reset, alarm reset) and
might be useful to include, but I agree with Krzysztof that adding
definitions with no users can accumulate technical debt.

Suggestion: either
- add the definitions when a driver actually needs them, or
- keep them now but add a short rationale in the commit message
  (datasheet reference + intended use) so future reviewers understand
  why they exist.

Also: please split cosmetic whitespace fixes (RTC_BBPU_KEY) into a
separate patch to make review/merge easier.

Thanks for the patch; I’m following the thread.

— Giorgi
Dear sir,
The MT6397 is an integration of several ICs and does not have a
separate IC specification. I will check the relevant IC datasheets
again. I will remove the useless define in next version.

Thanks for your commnets.

Best regards
Shunxi Zhangus

On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 3:03 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
On 11/08/2025 10:15, ot_shunxi.zhang@mediatek.com wrote:
quoted
From: Shunxi Zhang <redacted>

This patch adds new bit definitions for the RTC_BBPU register in
the
Why? There is no user of these. Don't add useless defines.
quoted
mt6397 RTC header file. The following bit definitions are
introduced:
Hm?
quoted
Signed-off-by: Shunxi Zhang <redacted>
---
 include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
index 27883af44f87..001cef6b7302 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
@@ -15,8 +15,11 @@
 #include <linux/rtc.h>

 #define RTC_BBPU               0x0000
+#define RTC_BBPU_PWREN         BIT(0)
+#define RTC_BBPU_CLR           BIT(1)
+#define RTC_BBPU_RESET_AL      BIT(3)
 #define RTC_BBPU_CBUSY         BIT(6)
-#define RTC_BBPU_KEY            (0x43 << 8)
+#define RTC_BBPU_KEY           (0x43 << 8)

Why?



Best regards,
Krzysztof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help