On 24/07/2025 10:43, Friday Yang (杨阳) wrote:
quoted
quoted
ignore this tag. What I intended to explain here was that I decided
not
to use 'devm_pm_runtime_enable' to replace 'pm_runtime_enable'
functions. Unfortunately, the fake tag didn't explain this clearly
in
the changelog, which was my fault. To address this, I updated
patchset
v8 to include an explanation.
In patchset v6, I replaced 'pm_runtime_enable' with
'devm_pm_runtime_enable'. However, in patchset v8, I reverted this
change and included the reason for this decision in the changelog.
Apologize for the delay and the trouble again.
Nothing above is related to my question about the
fake/invented/questioned tag.
I got your point, you refer to the 'reviewed-by' and 'acked-by' tag in
this patch.
These are the tags from two reviewers.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/174172361378.44650.15345202042780383326.robh@kernel.org/ (local)
You are really not responding to my initial comments and keep dragging
this discussion in some confused directions. Do we talk here about that
patch? No.
Best regards,
Krzysztof