Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add NVIDIA GB200-UT3.0b board
From: Donald Shannon <hidden>
Date: 2025-07-23 21:58:17
Also in:
linux-aspeed, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 7/22/25 22:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments On 23/07/2025 03:42, Donald Shannon wrote:quoted
This is an Aspeed AST2600 based unit testing platform for GB200. UT3.0b is different than nvidia-gb200nvl-bmc due to networking topology differences, additional gpio expanders, and voltage regulator gating some devices. Reference to Ast2600 SOC [1]. Reference to Blackwell GB200NVL Platform [2]. Link: https://www.aspeedtech.com/server_ast2600/ [1] Link: https://nvdam.widen.net/s/wwnsxrhm2w/blackwell-datasheet-3384703 [2] Signed-off-by: Donald Shannon <redacted> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>Why are you faking tags? No, you cannot just add whatever you want. Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, I think I was confused by your message on my V5 patch. I will remove the Acked-by and resubmit:
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding". The "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings. See also: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18 With above two: Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted> <form letter> This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags are being ignored. If you know the process, just skip it entirely (please do not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended, no patronizing, I just want to avoid wasted efforts). If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here ('b4 trailers -u ...'). However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
Thanks, Donald