Thread (57 messages) 57 messages, 9 authors, 2025-03-08

RE: [PATCH v7 3/5] Add debugfs based silicon debug support in DWC

From: Shradha Todi <hidden>
Date: 2025-03-05 12:57:19
Also in: linux-pci, linux-perf-users, linux-renesas-soc, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: 'Krzysztof Wilczyński' <redacted>
Sent: 05 March 2025 13:15
To: Shradha Todi <redacted>
Cc: 'Geert Uytterhoeven' <geert@linux-m68k.org>; 'Fan Ni' <redacted>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org; manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org;
lpieralisi@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; bhelgaas@google.com; jingoohan1@gmail.com; Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com;
a.manzanares@samsung.com; pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; cassel@kernel.org; 18255117159@163.com;
xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com; renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com; will@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; 'Yoshihiro Shimoda'
[off-list ref]; 'Linux-Renesas' [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] Add debugfs based silicon debug support in DWC

Hello,
quoted
I think we shouldn't move the log level to be a WARN. I believe many
controllers might not support RAS DES feature in their design and
giving a warn dump would draw unnecessary attention.
There will be no backtrack printed with neither dev_err() nor dev_warn(), which is what we were using here.  Using dev_WARN() or
the WARN() macro directly would be an overkill in this case, indeed.
Oh sorry, I thought we were talking about WARN() here.
quoted
My opinion is to silently let it fail unless the user is actually
interested in getting the RAS DES feature up.
I think, what we have there now is fine.  We don't error on the lack of RAS DES capability when the platform does not support it,
and
only return an error following a memory allocation failure, which should ideally never happen.

That said, have a look at the following:

  https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/log/?h=controller/dwc

This is how the code looks like at the moment.

We can still move it to dev_dbg(), so basically suppress any errors or warnings from being printed outside of the debug log level,
if you
think it would be better.
No, the current version looks perfect. Thanks!
Thank you!

	Krzysztof

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help