On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 03:46:36PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 01:19:14PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
quoted
I just have a prototype and tested on i.MX95.
You didn't answer me @[1]. How can we disable it for perf/cpufreq if there
are users already. I will look at the code once I am convince we can do that.
For now, I am not. I am worried we may break some platform.
The only user in upstream kernel with using the dummy clock is juno-scmi.dtsi.
SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF is used by two drivers cpufreq-scmi.c, scmi_perf_domain.c.
In cpufreq-scmi.c a dummy clock proviver is created, the gpu node in juno-scmi.dtsi
takes "<&scmi_dvfs 2>" into clocks property. I think this is wrong.
Why not use scmi_clk node? cpufreq created clk provider should only be limited
for cpu device which will not be impacted by fwdevlink.
If wanna to tune gpu performance, the power-domains property should be used,
not clocks property.
It is the juno-scmi.dtsi should be fixed.
If juno-scmi.dtsi will keep as it is, please suggest possible solution
on fixing the issue.
Regards,
Peng
--
Regards,
Sudeep
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241227151306.jh2oabc64xd54dms@bogus (local)