Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 7 authors, 2025-02-13

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Bypass setting fwnode for scmi cpufreq

From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2025-02-05 12:45:06
Also in: arm-scmi, imx, linux-gpio, lkml

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 03:13:29PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
index 2c853c84b58f530898057e4ab274ba76070de05e..7850eb7710f499888d32aebf5d99df63db8bfa26 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
@@ -344,6 +344,21 @@ static void __scmi_device_destroy(struct scmi_device *scmi_dev)
 	device_unregister(&scmi_dev->dev);
 }
 
+static int
+__scmi_device_set_node(struct scmi_device *scmi_dev, struct device_node *np,
+		       int protocol, const char *name)
+{
+	/* cpufreq device does not need to be supplier from devlink perspective */
+	if ((protocol == SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF) && !strcmp(name, "cpufreq")) {
I don't love this...  It seems like an hack.  Could we put a flag
somewhere instead?  Perhaps in scmi_device?  (I'm just saying that
because that's what we're passing to this function).

regards,
dan carpenter

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help