On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Jani Nikula [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Damon Ding [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
According to the comments in include/drm/drm_print.h, the DRM_...()
functions are deprecated in favor of drm_...() or dev_...() functions.
Use drm_err()/drm_dbg_core()/drm_dbg_kms() instead of
DRM_DEV_ERROR()/DRM_ERROR()/DRM_DEV_DEBUG()/DRM_DEBUG_KMS().
Signed-off-by: Damon Ding <redacted>
---
Changes in v6:
- Use drm_...() uniformly rather than mixing drm_...() and dev_..()
- Pass 'dp' in drm_...() rather than 'dp->drm_dev'
---
.../gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c | 29 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c
index 0844175c37c5..dd33d7540e4b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c
@@ -100,13 +100,13 @@ static int rockchip_dp_poweron(struct analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data)
ret = clk_prepare_enable(dp->pclk);
if (ret < 0) {
- DRM_DEV_ERROR(dp->dev, "failed to enable pclk %d\n", ret);
+ drm_err(dp, "failed to enable pclk %d\n", ret);
Please don't do this.
You're supposed to pass struct drm_device to drm_err() and friends. Not
some random struct pointer that just happens to have a ->dev member.
The drm_* macros may change at any time to actually expect the correct
type.
And with [1] I'm hoping "at any time" becomes "real soon now".
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1737644530.git.jani.nikula@intel.com (local)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel