Re: [PATCH v1] irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu: Fix irq_set_type for sei and nsr
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2025-01-23 08:45:02
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jan 20 2025 at 17:57, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 09:45:43AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jan 17 2025 at 19:03, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:quoted
It seems that irq_chip_set_type_parent is not failing. By adding some debug messages to kernel/irq/manage.c I found that irqd_get_trigger_type returns IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING even though it should return IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH according to the device tree. Maybe this was fixed between 6.10 and 6.12 but I need to analyze that again in more detail.The trigger type is fixed up in mvebu_icu_irq_domain_translate(), but that should be the same with the new code in mvebu_icu_translate(). Can you instrument mvebu_icu_translate() and validate that it is 1) Invoked at all 2) The type fixup is done: if (msi_data->subset_data->icu_group == ICU_GRP_SEI) *type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;Thanks a lot for pointing me in the right direction. I think I found what is going on. My instrumentation showed that we still end up in that function but the translation does not work. I think the reason is that the msi_data conversion is wrong. The following patch would solve the issue:diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c index b337f6c05f18..4eebed39880a 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c@@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static int mvebu_icu_translate(struct irq_domain *d, struct irq_fwspec *fwspec, unsigned long *hwirq, unsigned int *type) { unsigned int param_count = static_branch_unlikely(&legacy_bindings) ? 3 : 2; - struct mvebu_icu_msi_data *msi_data = d->host_data; + struct msi_domain_info *info = d->host_data; + struct mvebu_icu_msi_data *msi_data = info->chip_data; struct mvebu_icu *icu = msi_data->icu; /* Check the count of the parameters in dt */Do you agree with that fix? If so I will prepare a proper patch.
Duh, yes. What was I thinking?
Thanks,
tglx