Re: [PATCH v1] irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu: Fix irq_set_type for sei and nsr
From: Stefan Eichenberger <hidden>
Date: 2025-01-17 18:03:58
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 10:05:25PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Hi! On Thu, Jan 16 2025 at 18:12, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 09:15:24AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:quoted
And looking at the potential platform MSI providers for MVEBU, then it turns out that GICP and SEI both have the irq_set_type() callback populated, though ODMI has not. So either this has never worked or there is something else fishy. Can you please enable CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS, build/boot a 6.10 kernel and provide the output of cat /sys/kernel/debug/irq/irq/$N where $N is the interrupt number of the thermal sensor. Then provide the same information for a current kernel with your patch applied.You are right I somehow didn't look back far enough. I tested once with kernel 6.12.5 and my patch applied:quoted
root@localhost:~# uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 6.12.5+ #157 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jan 16 17:32:21 CET 2025 aarch64 GNU/Linux root@localhost:~# cat /proc/interrupts |grep thermal 35: 0 0 0 0 AP SEI 18 Level f06f8000.system-controller:thermal-sensor@80 90: 0 0 0 0 SEI-ICU-SEI-f21e0000.interrupt-controller:inter 116 Edge f2400000.system-controller:thermal-sensor@70 91: 0 0 0 0 SEI-ICU-SEI-f61e0000.interrupt-controller:inter 116 Edge f6400000.system-controller:thermal-sensor@70 root@localhost:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/irq/irqs/90 handler: handle_edge_irq device: f21e0000.interrupt-controller:interrupt-controller@50 status: 0x00000000 istate: 0x00004000 ddepth: 0 wdepth: 0 dstate: 0x02400204 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH IRQD_ACTIVATED IRQD_IRQ_STARTED IRQD_DEFAULT_TRIGGER_SET node: -1 affinity: 0-3 effectiv: domain: :cp0:config-space@f2000000:interrupt-controller@1e0000:interrupt-controller@50-16 hwirq: 0x74 chip: SEI-ICU-SEI-f21e0000.interrupt-controller:inter flags: 0x80 IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_LEVEL_MSI parent: domain: :ap807:config-space@f0000000:interrupt-controller@3f0200-2 hwirq: 0x0 chip: CP SEIOk. That explains it. CP SEI has: static int mvebu_sei_cp_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type) { if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) return -EINVAL; return 0; } But the DT configuration requests:quoted
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGHIRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH = 0x00000004,quoted
genirq: Setting trigger mode 4 for irq 85 failed (irq_chip_set_type_parent+0x0/0x34)which is not supported by CP SEI. With your patch the type request is just stored in the data, but no actual type setting happens. That's default behaviour for chips which do not have a set_type() callback.quoted
root@localhost:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/irq/irqs/90 handler: handle_edge_irq device: (null) It seems with kernel 6.10 the controller device was not set correctly, probably it was ignoring irq_set_type because of this.No. That's not related.quoted
Do you by chance have an idea how to properly fix this or should I do some more research?It's unclear to me how the 6.10 kernel survives that. Do you have a different device tree for those kernels?
I used the same device tree for the 6.10 kernel as I did for kernel
6.12. I didn't even recompile it. Unfortunately, I couldn't figure out
what exactly is different so far. However, on the 6.10 kernel I got the
following trace:
root@localhost:/sys/kernel/tracing# cat trace
# tracer: function_graph
#
# CPU DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
# | | | | | | |
1) | devm_request_threaded_irq() {
1) | request_threaded_irq() {
0) | __irq_set_trigger() {
0) | irq_chip_set_type_parent() {
0) | irq_chip_set_type_parent() {
0) 2.560 us | mvebu_sei_cp_set_type(); /* = 0x0 */
0) 8.640 us | } /* irq_chip_set_type_parent = 0x0 */
0) + 14.400 us | } /* irq_chip_set_type_parent = 0x0 */
0) + 24.320 us | } /* __irq_set_trigger = 0x0 */
0) * 13601.60 us | } /* request_threaded_irq = 0x0 */
0) * 13617.44 us | } /* devm_request_threaded_irq = 0x0 */
It seems that irq_chip_set_type_parent is not failing. By adding some
debug messages to kernel/irq/manage.c I found that irqd_get_trigger_type
returns IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING even though it should return
IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH according to the device tree. Maybe this was fixed
between 6.10 and 6.12 but I need to analyze that again in more detail.
[ 91.069407] genirq: __setup_irq - kernel/irq/manage.c:1530, flags: 0x0
[ 91.076042] genirq: __setup_irq - kernel/irq/manage.c:1533, flags: 0x1
For a possible solution, should I just change the device tree so that
IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING is used instead of IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH?
Regards,
Stefan