Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2024-12-31

Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] dt-bindings: display: vop2: Add rk3576 support

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-12-31 08:23:42
Also in: dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-phy, linux-rockchip, lkml

On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 06:49:38PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:

Hi Krzysztof,

At 2024-12-29 18:13:39, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 08:21:48PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
quoted
From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>

Add vop found on rk3576, the main difference between rk3576 and the
previous vop is that each VP has its own interrupt line.

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>

---

Changes in v2:
- describe constraint SOC by SOC, as interrupts of rk3576 is very
  different from others
- Drop Krzysztof's Reviewed-by, as this version changed a lot.

Changes in v1:
- ordered by soc name
- Add description for newly added interrupt

 .../display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml       | 70 +++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml
index 2531726af306..f28cea4a6d82 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
     enum:
       - rockchip,rk3566-vop
       - rockchip,rk3568-vop
+      - rockchip,rk3576-vop
       - rockchip,rk3588-vop
 
   reg:
@@ -37,10 +38,22 @@ properties:
       - const: gamma-lut
 
   interrupts:
-    maxItems: 1
-    description:
-      The VOP interrupt is shared by several interrupt sources, such as
-      frame start (VSYNC), line flag and other status interrupts.
+    minItems: 1
+    maxItems: 4
+    items:
+      - description:
That's contradictory. min/max say 1-4, but here you list two interrupts.
There are 4 interrupts on rk3576, and the other SOC only have one.
But you listed two interrupts, so where does the "two" come from?
I am sorry that I am not familiar with this schema language; I have read many
other YAML bindings these days and try to write it correctly.

Maybe I should not list the interrupts-names here(then list the interrupt-name by soc at allOf:  part),
 like the clocks handles in samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml  ?
xxx-names are supposed to be fully synced with xxx, so something needs
to be fixed here. You can of course remove interrupt-names *completely*
(but not partially, because all properties must be defined in top-level).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help