Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] dt-bindings: display: vop2: Add rk3576 support
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-12-31 08:23:42
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-phy, linux-rockchip, lkml
On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 06:49:38PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
Hi Krzysztof, At 2024-12-29 18:13:39, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 08:21:48PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:quoted
From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com> Add vop found on rk3576, the main difference between rk3576 and the previous vop is that each VP has its own interrupt line. Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com> --- Changes in v2: - describe constraint SOC by SOC, as interrupts of rk3576 is very different from others - Drop Krzysztof's Reviewed-by, as this version changed a lot. Changes in v1: - ordered by soc name - Add description for newly added interrupt .../display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml | 70 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml index 2531726af306..f28cea4a6d82 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties: enum: - rockchip,rk3566-vop - rockchip,rk3568-vop + - rockchip,rk3576-vop - rockchip,rk3588-vop reg:@@ -37,10 +38,22 @@ properties: - const: gamma-lut interrupts: - maxItems: 1 - description: - The VOP interrupt is shared by several interrupt sources, such as - frame start (VSYNC), line flag and other status interrupts. + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 4 + items: + - description:That's contradictory. min/max say 1-4, but here you list two interrupts.There are 4 interrupts on rk3576, and the other SOC only have one.
But you listed two interrupts, so where does the "two" come from?
I am sorry that I am not familiar with this schema language; I have read many other YAML bindings these days and try to write it correctly. Maybe I should not list the interrupts-names here(then list the interrupt-name by soc at allOf: part), like the clocks handles in samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml ?
xxx-names are supposed to be fully synced with xxx, so something needs to be fixed here. You can of course remove interrupt-names *completely* (but not partially, because all properties must be defined in top-level). Best regards, Krzysztof