On 26.08.2024 20:31, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Use the newly introduced macros instead of raw number. With this device
tree code is a bit easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi | 18 +++++++++---------
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama7g5.dtsi | 16 ++++++++--------
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi
index 04a6d716ecaf..eeda277e684f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ tcb0: timer@f8008000 {
#size-cells = <0>;
reg = <0xf8008000 0x100>;
interrupts = <17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
- clocks = <&pmc PMC_TYPE_PERIPHERAL 17>, <&clk32k 0>;
+ clocks = <&pmc PMC_TYPE_PERIPHERAL 17>, <&clk32k SCKC_MD_SLCK>;
Actually, looking again at it, I don't know if it worth as we use numbers
directly also for other PMC clock IDs.
Sorry for the noise,
Claudiu Beznea