On 13/08/2024 00:07, Jim Quinlan wrote:

On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 2:43 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 01/08/2024 00:28, Jim Quinlan wrote:

quoted

o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical
o Use "maxItems" where needed.

I asked at v3 and then in v4 about splitting this. You never responded
to that comment, so sorry I won't be repeating the same thing in v5.

I'm sorry Krzyszof, but I just reviewed your responses in V3 and V4
and I can't find you saying anything about splitting off the above two
bullet points.  Perhaps I am somehow losing email responses but all I
see is this in V3 is the following, where you ask me to do a squash,
not a commit:

    [JQ] o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical
    []KK] That's a cleanup. You can squash it with a previous patch.

Now you did say in V3

    [JQ] o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules
    [KK] That's a new commit.

but this bullet item does not relate to the bullet points you have
highlighted in this email.    As for your responses to V4, I don't see

It exactly relates to the quoted part. The comment is ALWAYS under exact
part of your patch being questioned/commented.

So first I said one part is cleanup and should be moved away. Then I
explained that this part is a NEW COMMIT. New, so one more, different.

I understand that this was not clear, but you never came with a question
what did I mean.

Best regards,
Krzysztof