Thread (52 messages) 52 messages, 5 authors, 2024-08-20

RE: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings

From: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>
Date: 2024-08-12 08:23:01
Also in: linux-aspeed, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml

Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings

On 12/08/2024 09:26, Ryan Chen wrote:
quoted
quoted
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock
bindings
quoted
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock
bindings

On 09/08/2024 07:47, Ryan Chen wrote:
quoted
quoted
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock
bindings

Le 08/08/2024 à 09:59, Ryan Chen a écrit :
quoted
Add dt bindings for AST2700 clock controller

Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>
---
  .../dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h    | 175
++++++++++++++++++
quoted
  1 file changed, 175 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644
include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..facf72352c3e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) */
+/*
+ * Device Tree binding constants for AST2700 clock controller.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2024 Aspeed Technology Inc.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_AST2700_H #define
+__DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_AST2700_H
+
+/* SOC0 clk-gate */
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_MCLK (0)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_ECLK (1)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_2DCLK        (2)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VCLK (3)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_BCLK (4)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VGA0CLK      (5)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_REFCLK       (6)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_PORTBUSB2CLK (7) #define
SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSV8
quoted
quoted
quoted
+(8)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UHCICLK      (9)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VGA1CLK      (10)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DDRPHYCLK    (11)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_E2M0CLK      (12)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_HACCLK       (13)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_PORTAUSB2CLK (14)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UART4CLK     (15)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_SLICLK       (16)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DACCLK       (17)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DP   (18)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_E2M1CLK      (19)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_CRT0CLK      (20)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_CRT1CLK      (21)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VLCLK        (22)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_ECDSACLK     (23)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSACLK       (24)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS0CLK     (25)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UFSCLK       (26)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_EMMCCLK      (27)
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK     (28)
+/* reserved 29 ~ 31*/
No, you cannot reserve IDs. They are always continous.
I think for mis-understood.
I will remove the comment.
And keep it is continuous. Thanks.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM  (SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK + 1)
No, not a binding.
I will modify by following.

#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK  (28)
#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM       (SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK + 1)
Nothing changed. Still not a binding. Why do you send the same and expect
different result? Drop.

Address feedback sent to you from previous versions of the patchset.
There was never a reply.
Sorry, mis-understood.
Since you think "#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM" not a binding.
Do you mean I should #define SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM in clk driver, not in binding header, am I right?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help