Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2024-06-25 12:29:55
Also in:
linux-aspeed, linux-usb, lkml
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2024-06-25 12:29:55
Also in:
linux-aspeed, linux-usb, lkml
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 02:00:15PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
quoted
We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.Why did you not choose an imperative wording for your change description? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n94quoted
Found by static analysis.Were any special tools involved? How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot