Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2024-06-26

Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2024-06-25 12:29:55
Also in: linux-aspeed, linux-usb, lkml

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 02:00:15PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
quoted
We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host
may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.
Why did you not choose an imperative wording for your change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n94

quoted
Found by static analysis.
Were any special tools involved?


How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help