Thread (63 messages) 63 messages, 6 authors, 2024-02-29

Re: [PATCH 10/13] i2c: nomadik: support Mobileye EyeQ5 I2C controller

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-19 14:35:52
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-i2c, linux-mips, lkml

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 5:52 PM Théo Lebrun [off-list ref] wrote:
Add compatible for the integration of the same DB8500 IP block into the
Mobileye EyeQ5 platform. Two quirks are present:

 - The memory bus only supports 32-bit accesses. One writeb() is done to
   fill the Tx FIFO which we replace with a writel().

 - A register must be configured for the I2C speed mode; it is located
   in a shared register region called OLB. We access that memory region
   using a syscon & regmap that gets passed as a phandle (mobileye,olb).

   A two-bit enum per controller is written into the register; that
   requires us to know the global index of the I2C
   controller (mobileye,id).

We add #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> and <linux/regmap.h> and sort
headers.

Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
(...)
-               writeb(*priv->cli.buffer, priv->virtbase + I2C_TFR);
+               if (priv->has_32b_bus)
+                       writel(*priv->cli.buffer, priv->virtbase + I2C_TFR);
+               else
+                       writeb(*priv->cli.buffer, priv->virtbase + I2C_TFR);
Are the other byte accessors working flawlessly? I get the shivers.
If it's needed in one place I bet the others prefer 32bit access too.

Further the MIPS is big-endian is it not? It feels that this just happens
to work because of byte order access? writel() is little-endian by
definition.

What happens if you replace all writeb():s with something like

static void nmk_write_reg(struct nmk_i2c_dev *priv, u32 reg, u8 val)
{
    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN))
        writeb(val, priv->virtbase + reg + 3);
        // if this doesn't work then use writeb((u32)val,
priv->virtbase + reg) I guess
   else
        writeb(val, priv->virtbase + reg);
}

and conversely for readb()?

Other accessors such as iowrite* are perhaps viable in this case, I'm not sure.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help