On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 12:08:23PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:50:25AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 02:48:14PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
quoted
Introduce helper function dw_pcie_get_ltssm() to retrieve SMLH_LTSS_STATE.
...
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
index 615660640801..91d13f9b21b1 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
quoted
@@ -364,6 +375,7 @@ struct dw_pcie_ops {
void (*write_dbi2)(struct dw_pcie *pcie, void __iomem *base, u32 reg,
size_t size, u32 val);
int (*link_up)(struct dw_pcie *pcie);
+ enum dw_pcie_ltssm (*get_ltssm)(struct dw_pcie *pcie);
This has already been applied as
https://git.kernel.org/linus/4774faf854f5 ("PCI: dwc: Implement
generic suspend/resume functionality"), but this .get_ltssm() pointer
doesn't seem to be used anywhere. Should we remove it until we need
it?
Could you place hold on for a while? I am working on imx PCIe. One old
imx6 may need it!
If not, I will submit patch to clean it. My new patches depend on
https://lore.kernel.org/imx/ZbJ+tFPn3aOYHCwf@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810/T/#t (local)
All already reviewed, could you please pick up these, so I can continue
my futher work.
Another
https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20240201-pme_msg-v2-0-6767052fe6a4@nxp.com/T/#t (local)
was under review.
OK. I don't see .get_ltssm() used in that series either. But if you
will need it soon, no point in removing it right now.
Bjorn
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel