Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: samsung: gs101: don't mark non-essential clocks as critical
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-01 10:02:31
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 30/01/2024 10:36, André Draszik wrote:
The peric0_top1_ipclk_0 and peric0_top1_pclk_0 are the clocks going to
peric0/uart_usi, with pclk being the bus clock. Without pclk running,
any bus access will hang.
Unfortunately, in commit d97b6c902a40 ("arm64: dts: exynos: gs101:
update USI UART to use peric0 clocks") the gs101 DT ended up specifying
an incorrect pclk in the respective node and instead the two clocks
here were marked as critical.
We have fixed the gs101 DT and can therefore drop this incorrect
work-around here, the uart driver will claim these clocks as needed.How did you fixed the DTS? Which commit did it? Are we going back to basics of driver changes depending on DTS? Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel