Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2024-02-05

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: s32g: add uSDHC clock IDs

From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-01-19 16:14:18
Also in: linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 04:11:37PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:02:28PM +0200, Ghennadi Procopciuc (OSS) wrote:
quoted
From: Ghennadi Procopciuc <redacted>

Add the SCMI clock IDs for the uSDHC controller present on
S32G SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Ciprian Costea <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <redacted>
---
 include/dt-bindings/clock/s32g-scmi-clock.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/s32g-scmi-clock.h
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/s32g-scmi-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/s32g-scmi-clock.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..739f98a924c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/s32g-scmi-clock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause) */
+/*
+ * Copyright 2020-2024 NXP
+ */
+#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_SCMI_CLK_S32G_H
+#define _DT_BINDINGS_SCMI_CLK_S32G_H
+
+/* uSDHC */
+#define S32G_SCMI_CLK_USDHC_AHB		31
+#define S32G_SCMI_CLK_USDHC_MODULE	32
+#define S32G_SCMI_CLK_USDHC_CORE	33
+#define S32G_SCMI_CLK_USDHC_MOD32K	34
Why do these numbers not start at 0?
Ah, because these are the SCMI IDs directly. If these are numbers that
are in the TRM, just use the numbers directly - there's no need to
create bindings for that.

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help