Thread (52 messages) 52 messages, 4 authors, 2024-01-19

Re: [PATCH 11/18] tty: serial: samsung: don't compare with zero an if (bitwise expression)

From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Date: 2024-01-16 18:38:13
Also in: linux-samsung-soc, linux-serial, lkml

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:24 AM Tudor Ambarus [off-list ref] wrote:
Since an if tests the numeric value of an expression, certain coding
shortcuts can be used. The most obvious one is writing
    if (expression)
instead of
    if (expression != 0)

Since our case is a bitwise expression, it's more natural and clear to
use the ``if (expression)`` shortcut.
Maybe the author of this code:

    (ufstat & info->tx_fifomask) != 0

just wanted to outline (logically) that the result of this bitwise
operation produces FIFO length, which he checks to have non-zero
length? Mechanically of course it doesn't matter much, and I guess
everyone can understand what's going on there even without '!= 0'
part. But it looks quite intentional to me, because in the same 'if'
block the author uses this as well:

    (ufstat & info->tx_fifofull)

without any comparison operators.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
index dbbe6b8e3ceb..f2413da14b1d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
@@ -988,8 +988,7 @@ static unsigned int s3c24xx_serial_tx_empty(struct uart_port *port)
        u32 ufcon = rd_regl(port, S3C2410_UFCON);

        if (ufcon & S3C2410_UFCON_FIFOMODE) {
-               if ((ufstat & info->tx_fifomask) != 0 ||
-                   (ufstat & info->tx_fifofull))
+               if ((ufstat & info->tx_fifomask) || (ufstat & info->tx_fifofull))
Does this line fit into 80 characters? If no, please rework it so it
does. I guess it's also possible to get rid of superfluous braces
there, but then the code might look confusing, and I'm not sure if
checkpatch would be ok with that.
                        return 0;

                return 1;
--
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help