Re: [PATCH v3 02/20] dt-bindings: clock: Add Google gs101 clock management unit bindings
From: William McVicker <hidden>
Date: 2023-10-12 16:41:10
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-samsung-soc, linux-serial, linux-watchdog
Hi Krzysztof, On 10/12/2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 12/10/2023 12:45, Peter Griffin wrote:quoted
Hi Krzysztof, On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 12/10/2023 10:56, Peter Griffin wrote:quoted
Hi Krzysztof, On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 07:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 11/10/2023 23:48, William McVicker wrote:quoted
On 10/11/2023, Peter Griffin wrote:quoted
Provide dt-schema documentation for Google gs101 SoC clock controller. Currently this adds support for cmu_top, cmu_misc and cmu_apm. Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>Tested-by: Will McVicker <redacted>And how do you perform testing of a binding?I guess if William is using my script to build and flash the kernel it actually runs the DTC checks as part of the build process. See https://git.codelinaro.org/linaro/googlelt/pixelscripts/-/blob/clo/main/buildp21upstream.sh#L44So it is a build test? We do not consider building as a test procedure, otherwise I should add my and robots tested-by to many other patches.Ok so I should only add the Tested-by on the .c patches?In my opinion, if someone performs only build testing, it is not a testing. You cannot test the bindings other way than build testing, at least I do not know such way. Of course other code like C or DTS affects hardware so it can be tested.
What additional testing beside building and booting do you prefer at this stage? I put my Tested-by for this patch because it includes the google,gs101.h header which is used by the DT and clock controller driver during boot. Maybe I should have been more clear on what I tested in each patch instead of only mentioning how I tested in the cover letter? Sorry for the confusion. Thanks, Will
quoted
quoted
Shall I consider other Tested-by tags here also as build-tested only?No. William indicated here https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/ZScZu-QB2LmB4CSM@google.com/T/#mbd96a26b725d6c85eb4193de8cd70ff277bc728e (local) that he booted it on his Oriole device.OK, I was just a bit confused. Best regards, Krzysztof
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel