Hi Krzysztof,

krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org wrote on Mon, 16 Oct 2023 22:43:28 +0200:

On 16/10/2023 22:10, Frank Li wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 09:57:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:  

quoted

On 16/10/2023 21:32, Frank Li wrote:  

quoted

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 06:30:11PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:  

quoted

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:24:49AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:  

quoted

In driver, compatible string is silvaco,i3c-master instead of
silvaco,i3c-master-v1.  

And what makes the driver right & the binding wrong? AFAICT, this is an
IP sold by silvaco & the -v1 suffix was explicitly requested during
review of the binding.  

The driver existed for the long time. DTS files already use
silvaco,i3c-master.

There are two options, one change doc, the other change dts and drivers.
I think change doc is easiest ways.

If there are v2 in future, we can added silvaco,i3c-master-v2 in future.

If everyone prefer change drivers and dts, I can work on new patch. Just
break back compatiblity.  

No, because Rob explicitly pointed out too generic name.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210111200821.GA2978830@robh.at.kernel.org/ (local)

Is it some way to avoid implementing feedback or how does it work?  

Not at all, it's my (faithful) fault, I did update the bindings upon
Rob request and apparently kept the previous string in the driver.

After thinking again I would drop silvaco,i3c-master entirely from the
driver, it was never intended to keep it.

Thanks,
Miquèl

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel