On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 09:57:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 16/10/2023 21:32, Frank Li wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 06:30:11PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:24:49AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
quoted
In driver, compatible string is silvaco,i3c-master instead of
silvaco,i3c-master-v1.
And what makes the driver right & the binding wrong? AFAICT, this is an
IP sold by silvaco & the -v1 suffix was explicitly requested during
review of the binding.
The driver existed for the long time. DTS files already use
silvaco,i3c-master.
There are two options, one change doc, the other change dts and drivers.
I think change doc is easiest ways.
If there are v2 in future, we can added silvaco,i3c-master-v2 in future.
If everyone prefer change drivers and dts, I can work on new patch. Just
break back compatiblity.
No, because Rob explicitly pointed out too generic name.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210111200821.GA2978830@robh.at.kernel.org/ (local)
Is it some way to avoid implementing feedback or how does it work?
Downstream use silvaco,i3c-master to match driver. Anyways, miss match
happened.
option 1: fix doc
option 2: fix driver and dts
what do you perfer?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel