Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2023-09-25

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] staging: vc04: Drop custom logging

From: Stefan Wahren <hidden>
Date: 2023-09-23 10:27:17
Also in: linux-media, linux-staging, lkml

Hi Umang,

Am 23.09.23 um 11:39 schrieb Umang Jain:
Hi Stefan,

On 9/17/23 9:06 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
quoted
Hi,

Am 14.09.23 um 08:35 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
quoted
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:25:24AM +0530, Umang Jain wrote:
quoted
Hello,

This series attempts to restart the discussion on custom logging used
in VC04. In the last feedback gathered in [1] it seems that the logging
would rather be moved to use dynamic debug. The series tries to move
in that direction.

The elephant in the room is the ability of turning on/off log levels,
which this series just drops. Compensated by a crude strings
("error", "warning", "info"... etc) for easier grepping.

The log category are also just strings (which probably can be 
transformed
to dynamic debug class names moving forwards?).

To move forwards, I would like feedback on the broader direction.
There are couple of TODOs in each of the patch (summarised in commit
messages) which require case-by-case discussion.

Additional high-level questions to move forwards:
1. Is loss of log levels by moving to dynamic debug, is actually a
    concern? Is dynamic debug a valid replacement?
Dynamic debug is honestly going to be an improvement.  I guess, Greg and
I said this back in Jan.
+1
quoted
quoted
quoted
2. Whether debugfs should be dropped as well, found vestigial in [2]
Yes. The "vchiq/log" should be removed.  Ideally as part of this
patchset so it's easier to understand.
Yes, but please do not remote vchiq_debugfs entirely. I'm working on a 
patch to move the state dump (debug feature) from the character device 
/dev/vchiq to debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/vchiq/dump_state.
Can't the state dump be printed to dev_dbg() ? Will it pollute the 
kernel log?  Having debugfs for a single dump doesn't seem worthwhile if 
the state dump can be incorporated to dev_dbg() too.
debugfs was created for a good reason. dev_dbg() is a nice tool, but it 
isn't useful in every situation. In case of communication the usage of 
counter is quite popular and removing this ability would make debugging 
not easier.

Try to make "cat /dev/vchiq" you will see you don't want pollute the 
kernel log with this kind of information.

Actually i don't see a problem with have a single dump in debugfs.

Let me send a draft of my changes for a better discussion ...

Regards
Stefan
quoted
quoted
quoted
3. whether vchiq_log_trace() should actually be tracing support for 
VC04
That can be done later if people want.  No need to discuss it now.
Thanks Dan.
quoted
quoted
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help