On 11/08/2023 11:49, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On 08/08/2023 01:13, Andi Shyti wrote:
quoted
Hi Krzysztof,
[...]
quoted
+static void __iomem *fimc_is_get_pmu_regs(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct device_node *node;
+ void __iomem *regs;
+
+ node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "samsung,pmu-syscon", 0);
+ if (!node) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "Finding PMU node via deprecated method, update your DTB\n");
+ node = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "pmu");
+ if (!node)
+ return IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
in my opinion this should be:
...
if (!node)
return IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
dev_warn(dev, "Finding PMU node via deprecated method, update your DTB\n");
Because if you don't have both "samsung,pmu-syscon and "pmu" then
the warning should not be printed and you need to return -ENODEV.
I agree with Andi for this part.
The only time you want to see this message is if samsung,pmu-syscon is
missing AND pmu is present. If both are missing, then just return ENODEV as
it was before.
OK, understood. I will send a v3.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel