Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move CD table to arm_smmu_master
From: Michael Shavit <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-10 09:24:18
Also in:
linux-iommu, lkml
quoted
@@ -2465,6 +2450,22 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) if (smmu_domain->stage != ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS) master->ats_enabled = arm_smmu_ats_supported(master); + if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1) { + if (!master->cd_table.cdtab) { + ret = arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(master); + if (ret) { + master->domain = NULL; + return ret; + } + } + + ret = arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(master, 0, &smmu_domain->cd); + if (ret) { + master->domain = NULL; + return ret;Can you leak the cd tables here if you just allocated them?
The CD table is only de-allocated when the SMMU device is released, so this isn't "leaked" anymore than on a successful attachment. In a previous version of this patch, this CD table was even pre-allocated at probe time but is deferred to first attach following this discussion: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZMOzs1%2FxoEPX2+vA@nvidia.com/ (local) .
quoted
@@ -2472,10 +2473,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags); arm_smmu_enable_ats(master); - -out_unlock: - mutex_unlock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex); - return ret; + return 0; } static int arm_smmu_map_pages(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,@@ -2719,6 +2717,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_release_device(struct device *dev) arm_smmu_detach_dev(master); arm_smmu_disable_pasid(master); arm_smmu_remove_master(master); + if (master->cd_table.cdtab_dma)Why are you checking 'cdtab_dma' here instead of just 'cdtab'?
cd_table is statically allocated as part of the arm_smmu_master struct. I suppose it could be allocated by arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables() instead? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel