Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] i2c: mlxbf: Use dev_err_probe in probe function
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-08-08 20:45:15
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-i2c, lkml
Hi Krzysztof, On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 01:31:31PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 08/08/2023 13:29, Andi Shyti wrote:quoted
Hi Krzysztof, On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:36:40AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
On 08/08/2023 03:29, Liao Chang wrote:quoted
Use the dev_err_probe function instead of dev_err in the probe function so that the printed messge includes the return value and also handles -EPROBE_DEFER nicely. Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <redacted>...quoted
@@ -2413,10 +2399,8 @@ static int mlxbf_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, mlxbf_i2c_irq, IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_PROBE_SHARED, dev_name(dev), priv); - if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(dev, "Cannot get irq %d\n", irq); - return ret; - } + if (ret < 0) + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Cannot get irq %d\n", irq);I don't think this is needed: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230721094641.77189-1-frank.li@vivo.com/ (local)Hmm, that's a bit borderline, I'd say. The change toWhat's borderline exactly? devm_request_threaded_irq_probe() is coming, right? If it is accepted this hunk is useless and soon should be replaced with proper one.
Such change is out of the scope of this series, there are two
options that I'd prefer (in the listed order):
1. accept the patch as it is, this patch is not sent today the
first time and at the current state it's correct.
2. not accept a change on this line
Replacing devm_request_irq belongs to another series and,
besides, I don't want to ask Liao to hold on this series for such
trivialities.
Thank you,
Andi
Instead of making many trivial changes doing the same, all these series should be aligned.quoted
devm_request_irq/devm_request_threaded_irq_probe seems like something for another series. But for now, I think I'll accept this as it is since it fits within the scope of this current series.Best regards, Krzysztof
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel