Re: [PATCH v15 3/6] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock
From: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-08-03 10:29:13
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 4:50 PM Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:14:05PM -0400, Guo Ren wrote:quoted
The pv_ops is belongs to x86 custom frame work, and it prevent other architectures connect to the CNA spinlock.static_call() exists as a arch neutral variant of this.
Emm... we have used static_call() in the riscv queued_spin_lock_: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230802164701.192791-20-guoren@kernel.org/ (local) But we met a compile problem: GEN .vmlinux.objs MODPOST Module.symvers ERROR: modpost: "__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock" [arch/riscv/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock" [kernel/locking/locktorture.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock" [mm/z3fold.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock" [fs/nfs_common/grace.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock" [fs/quota/quota_v1.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock" [fs/quota/quota_v2.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock" [fs/quota/quota_tree.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock" [fs/fuse/virtiofs.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock" [fs/dlm/dlm.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock" [fs/fscache/fscache.ko] undefined! WARNING: modpost: suppressed 839 unresolved symbol warnings because there were too many) /home/guoren/source/kernel/linux/scripts/Makefile.modpost:144: recipe for target 'Module.symvers' failed Our solution is: EXPORT_SYMBOL(__SCK__pv_queued_spin_unlock); What do you think about it?
quoted
I'm working on riscv qspinlock on sg2042 64 cores 2/4 NUMA nodes platforms. Here are the patches about riscv CNA qspinlock: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230802164701.192791-19-guoren@kernel.org/ (local) What's the next plan for this patch series? I think the two-queue design has satisfied most platforms with two NUMA nodes.What has been your reason for working on CNA? What lock has been so contended you need this?
I wrote the reason here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230802164701.192791-1-guoren@kernel.org/ (local) The target platform is: https://www.sophon.ai/ The two NUMA nodes platform has come out, so we want to measure the benefit of CNA qspinlock. Any feedbacks are welcome :) -- Best Regards Guo Ren _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel