Re: [PATCH v15 3/6] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2023-08-03 08:50:51
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2023-08-03 08:50:51
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:14:05PM -0400, Guo Ren wrote:
The pv_ops is belongs to x86 custom frame work, and it prevent other architectures connect to the CNA spinlock.
static_call() exists as a arch neutral variant of this.
I'm working on riscv qspinlock on sg2042 64 cores 2/4 NUMA nodes platforms. Here are the patches about riscv CNA qspinlock: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230802164701.192791-19-guoren@kernel.org/ (local) What's the next plan for this patch series? I think the two-queue design has satisfied most platforms with two NUMA nodes.
What has been your reason for working on CNA? What lock has been so contended you need this? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel