Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 6 authors, 2023-08-05

Re: [PATCH v15 3/6] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2023-08-03 08:50:51
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:14:05PM -0400, Guo Ren wrote:
The pv_ops is belongs to x86 custom frame work, and it prevent other
architectures connect to the CNA spinlock.
static_call() exists as a arch neutral variant of this.
I'm working on riscv qspinlock on sg2042 64 cores 2/4 NUMA nodes
platforms. Here are the patches about riscv CNA qspinlock:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230802164701.192791-19-guoren@kernel.org/ (local)

What's the next plan for this patch series? I think the two-queue design
has satisfied most platforms with two NUMA nodes.
What has been your reason for working on CNA? What lock has been so
contended you need this?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help