On Wed, Aug 02, 2023, Marc Zyngier wrote:

On Tue, 01 Aug 2023 01:42:54 +0100,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Thanks for the suggestions; I can go with a common declaration. Along
with that, do we want to keep defining
__KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS in the arch code that supports it or
convert it into a CONFIG_?

This isn't something that a user can select, more something that is an
architectural decision. Maybe in a later patch if there is a consensus
around that, but probably not as part of this series.

+1.  I agree it's annoying that KVM uses a mix of Kconfigs and manual #defines
for the various "KVM_HAVE" knobs, but we have so many of both that one-off
conversions without a real need don't make much sense.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel