On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:29:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 04:14:57PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ map[index] &= ~(GENMASK(nbits + offset - 1, offset));
I remember that this construction may bring horrible code on some architectures
with some version(s) of the compiler (*).
Wow, even the trunk Clang and GCC seem to generate better code for
your version of this line: https://godbolt.org/z/36Kqxhe6j
Wow, indeed! Perhaps time to report to clang and GCC people. I believe the root
cause is that in the original version compiler can't prove that l is constant
for GENMASK().
quoted
quoted
To fix that I found an easy refactoring:
map[index] &= ~(GENMASK(nbits, 0) << offset));
nbits - 1 it should be, btw. In any case it seems the code is still better.
quoted
I'll take this one.
quoted
(*) don't remember the actual versions, though, but anyway...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel