On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:29:36 +0100,
Eric Auger [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Marc,
On 6/6/23 09:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:

quoted

Hey Eric,

On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 12:28:12 +0100,
Eric Auger [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi Marc,

On 5/15/23 19:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:

quoted

This is the 4th drop of NV support on arm64 for this year.

For the previous episodes, see [1].

What's changed:

- New framework to track system register traps that are reinjected in
  guest EL2. It is expected to replace the discrete handling we have
  enjoyed so far, which didn't scale at all. This has already fixed a
  number of bugs that were hidden (a bunch of traps were never
  forwarded...). Still a work in progress, but this is going in the
  right direction.

- Allow the L1 hypervisor to have a S2 that has an input larger than
  the L0 IPA space. This fixes a number of subtle issues, depending on
  how the initial guest was created.

- Consequently, the patch series has gone longer again. Boo. But
  hopefully some of it is easier to review...

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405154008.3552854-1-maz@kernel.org (local)

Andre Przywara (1):
  KVM: arm64: nv: vgic: Allow userland to set VGIC maintenance IRQ

I guess you have executed kselftests on L1 guests. Have all the tests
passed there? On my end it stalls in the KVM_RUN.

No, I hardly run any kselftest, because they are just not designed to
run at EL2 at all. There's some work to be done there, but I just
don't have the bandwidth for that (hint, wink...)

oh OK, I missed that point. If nobody is working on this I can start
looking at it. Would be interesting to run them on nested guest too.

If you want to pick this up, it would be extremely helpful. And no,
nobody is really looking into it at the moment, so it's all yours!

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel